Peer Review & Responsibilities

Anakara Publishing maintains a transparent and rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and credibility of all scholarly publications. This page outlines responsibilities for authors and reviewers in compliance with international standards.

Peer Review Process

• Submissions are evaluated by independent experts in the relevant field.
• Reviews are conducted under a double-blind system whenever possible to ensure impartiality.
• Reviewers provide constructive feedback within 4–6 weeks.
• Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit, originality, and contribution to the field.

Author Responsibilities

• Ensure all work is original and properly cite all sources.
• Comply with ethical research standards and necessary approvals (e.g., human or animal studies).
• Respond to reviewer feedback and make revisions promptly.
• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest during submission.

Reviewer Responsibilities

• Provide unbiased, thorough, and confidential evaluations.
• Give feedback that is constructive, objective, and aligned with ethical standards.
• Disclose any conflicts of interest affecting impartiality.
• Maintain confidentiality and refrain from using manuscript content for personal advantage.

Ethical Principles

• Anakara Publishing ensures transparency and fairness in all peer review activities.
• All participants—authors, reviewers, and editors—adhere to the highest standards of academic integrity.
• Any ethical concern during the review process can be reported to info@anakarapublishing.com